首页> 外文OA文献 >Treatment of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections with 3 days of lomefloxacin compared with treatment with 3 days of norfloxacin.
【2h】

Treatment of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections with 3 days of lomefloxacin compared with treatment with 3 days of norfloxacin.

机译:洛美沙星治疗3天与诺氟沙星治疗3天相比,治疗急性单纯性尿路感染。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The bacteriologic and clinical efficacies of 3 days of lomefloxacin therapy were compared with those of 3 days of norfloxacin therapy for the treatment of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. One hundred sixty-four subjects were enrolled at five Canadian centers; 84 received lomefloxacin, and 80 received norfloxacin. Escherichia coli (84%) and Staphylococcus saprophyticus (11%) were the most common organisms isolated. Forty subjects (24%) had low quantitative counts in their pretherapy urine specimens. In the intent-to-treat analysis, 76 lomefloxacin subjects (91%) and 76 norfloxacin subjects (95%) were cured or improved at follow-up 5 to 9 days posttreatment and 73 (87%) and 71 (89%) subjects from the lomefloxacin and norfloxacin groups, respectively, were cured or improved at 4 to 6 weeks posttreatment. Bacteriologic eradication occurred in 61 of 63 lomefloxacin subjects (97%) with > or = 10(8) CFU/liter in their pretherapy specimens and 56 of 59 norfloxacin subjects (95%) at 5 to 9 days and 55 (87%) and 53 (90%) subjects from the lomefloxacin and norfloxacin groups, respectively, at 4 to 6 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences in outcome. Adverse effects which were potentially related to the study medications were reported by 26% of the subjects who received lomefloxacin and 25% of the subjects who received norfloxacin. There were no severe adverse events, and only one subject discontinued therapy. These data suggest that 3 days of therapy with either lomefloxacin or norfloxacin is effective in the treatment of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections.
机译:在一项前瞻性,随机,双盲研究中,比较了洛美沙星治疗3天与诺氟沙星治疗3天治疗急性单纯性尿路感染的细菌学和临床疗效。在加拿大的五个中心招募了一百六十四名受试者。 84名接受洛美沙星治疗,80名接受诺氟沙星治疗。大肠杆菌(84%)和腐生葡萄球菌(11%)是最常见的分离生物。四十名受试者(24%)的治疗前尿液样本中的定​​量计数较低。在意向治疗分析中,治疗后5到9天的随访中76例洛美沙星受试者(91%)和76例诺氟沙星受试者(95%)治愈或得到改善,而73例(87%)和71例(89%)分别在洛美沙星和诺氟沙星组中治疗后4至6周治愈或改善。 63名洛美沙星受试者中有61名(97%)的治疗前标本≥10(8)CFU /升,而59名诺氟沙星受试者中有56名(95%)在5至9天和55(87%)发生细菌根除在4至6周时分别有53名(90%)的洛美沙星和诺氟沙星组的受试者。结果无统计学差异。据报道,接受洛美沙星的受试者中有26%和接受诺氟沙星的受试者中有25%报告了与研究药物潜在相关的不良反应。没有严重的不良事件,只有一名受试者停止治疗。这些数据表明,洛美沙星或诺氟沙星治疗3天可有效治疗急性单纯性尿路感染。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号